Malice (1993) Poster

(1993)

User Reviews

Review this title
140 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
See it once for the suspense, and again for the acting.
Scarlet-2211 October 1999
MALICE is one of those movies that you simply MUST see more than once to believe. The first time through, MALICE is a great psychological thriller, with twists and turns through a plot that contains rape, murder, life-and-death trauma, and a fight to the death...all within the first 45 minutes. The second time through, though, provides a look at all the things you might have missed the first time around...and a chance to savor an outstanding performance from perhaps the most underrated actor in Hollywood, Alec Baldwin.

Bill Pullman plays Andy Safien, an associate dean at a small New England college outside of Boston that's currently under siege by a serial rapist who claims his latest victim as the film opens. Nicole Kidman plays his wife Tracy, a volunteer in the pediatrics ward of St. Agnes Hospital. They're renovating a Victorian house and need $14,000 for the plumbing. Enter Alec Baldwin as Dr. Jed Hill, a former high school classmate of Andy's, who's brand new in town and needs a place to stay. Andy needs the money, Jed needs a room, so the two hook up and soon Jed is sleeping upstairs in the Safiens' home...usually not alone, and his sexual escapades are grating on Tracy's nerves. The rapes continue, Andy is fingered as a suspect, and in the midst of it all, Tracy collapses with a ruptured ovarian cyst. Jed operates to save her life (after a night of drinking and wild partying), but renders her unable to bear children...leading to a malpractice suit from Tracy and an incredible soliloquy on surgeons with a God complex from Jed during the deposition.

But once the first half of the film is over, things really start to roll. Without revealing the rest of the plot, suffice it to say that as Andy, Tracy, and Jed all try to start their lives over again, their fates become inextricably entangled.

The movie is worth seeing once as a thriller. But the second time around, Baldwin's mesmerizing performance is what stands out. Jed is charismatic, seductive, and as charming as a cobra as he weaves his spell over the Safiens. Baldwin's ability to jump from utterly charming to incredibly chilling in the blink of an eye is on full display here; it is truly the performance of a lifetime.

See it once for the suspense, and again for the acting.
88 out of 95 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Great Thriller with Many Twists
claudio_carvalho21 December 2014
Warning: Spoilers
In Massachusetts, there is a rapist attacking young women and Detective Dana (Bebe Neuwirth) is investigating the cases. The college professor Andy Safian (Bill Pullman) and his former student and presently school teacher Tracy (Nicole Kidman) are happily married and are trying to have a baby. When the last victim of the rapist that studies at Andy's college is sent to the Saint Agnes Hospital, the surgeon Dr. Jed Hill (Alec Baldwin) saves her life. Andy recognizes Jed that had studied with him and they become close to each other. Soon Andy invites Jed to rent a room in his house to help him in the expenses despite Tracy's protest. When Tracy has a miscarriage, Jed takes the decision of removing her ovary with the support of Andy to save her life without waiting for the results from the laboratory. Soon he leans that Tracy's ovary was healthy and she decides to sue the hospital in US$ 20 million, using her friend, the lawyer Dennis Riley (Peter Gallagher). Tracy leaves Andy and accuses Jed of God Complex. When another student of Andy's college is murdered by the rapist, Andy becomes a suspect and has to donate sperm to prove his innocence. When Detective Dana shows Andy the laboratory result that clears him, he finds that he is sterile. Now Andy decides to investigate his wife deeper and finds hidden secrets about her.

"Malice" is a great thriller from the 90's, with a plot with many twists. Alec Baldwin has a magnificent performance in the role of an ambitious doctor with God Complex. The twists lead the viewer to different directions and the truth about Tracy is totally unpredictable. Last but not the least, it is great to see the young cast with Alec Baldwin, Nicole Kidman, Bill Pullman, Peter Gallagher and Gwyneth Paltrow working with the veterans George C. Scott and Anne Bancroft. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "Malícia" ("Malice")
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Ain't no wonderland
TBJCSKCNRRQTreviews27 September 2008
This is pretty dark. In the very literal sense, as in, the lighting can hardly be described as being overpowering, and figuratively, since it's not exactly a Disney-fied fairy tale. It may require, if not necessarily multiple viewings, then at least attention paid. The plot is well-written, and takes some serious turns. It should throw most viewers for a loop, and it manages to retain a level of believability that not all recent twist-flicks can boast. The cinematography and editing are of high quality throughout, with no exceptions. The acting is spot-on almost invariably, everyone turns in a solid performance... Kidman, Baldwin, Pullman, Scott, Bancroft, not a disappointment to be found among them. The supporting players, as well. The writing leaves rather little(if not nothing) to be desired, and remains excellent for the duration. The pacing is appropriate. The three attempts at doing a proper accent are appreciated, and this is by no means the only film to lack in that department. There is a bit of sex in this, if not that much nudity, considering. There is a moderate amount of language, and it can be fairly harsh. The DVD holds cast biographies(yes, *yippie*) as well as a trailer, which I would not suggest you watch before the movie itself, as it could give stuff away. I recommend this to any fans of the people involved in making it, as well as the genres of crime, thriller, and/or mystery. 7/10
21 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Terrific acting and great cast! ***SPOILERS***
guil122 December 2001
Warning: Spoilers
Have seen this film several times and am hooked. Even though I know the outcome, who cares. It's worth it just to see these fine actors do their thing as they do best. Alec Baldwin, who never ceases to amaze me in his work, is splendid as the doctor/villain [and what a smoothie he is]. His God "complex" speech is one of the highlights. Then there's the delicious Nicole Kidman, as the demon wife of a mild schoolteacher, who goes for the icing on the cake by knocking off anyone that gets in her way. What makes her performance stand out to me is that, as wild and evil as she can be, there's also a vulnerability in her portrayal. You actually care what happens to her, even though you know she deserves to get caught. This is the worst kind of a villain. One that you hope won't get caught. I loved the scene in the bar where she confronts her husband with smiles and flirting only to realize it won't work. The change of expression and attitude was delightful. Thanks, Nicole. And Bill Pullman, being given a sort of wimpish character to play, brings it way up to the same level as the stronger characters with his performance. He does an outstanding job in this flick. I've not seen his work before, but will surely look for more roles in the future. Playing smaller roles are Bebe Neuwirth as a cop who helps our professor solve the case, and Gwyneth Paltrow, in one of her earlier roles playing a bimbo student under Pullman's tutelege who unfortunately becomes a victim of a serial rapist. George C. Scott appears, quite briefly, as a sort of chief surgeon defending Baldwin's reputation in the medical profession, Peter Gallagher [that handsome devil] appears as Kidman's lawyer in two scenes and that incredible Anne Bancroft in one scene, but she almost steals the picture with her alcoholic card tricks. Annie's the best! Director Harold Becker does a good job with his stellar cast, but sometimes the film is too dark. At least on television it comes off hard to see. But I loved the scene when Nicole is waiting in her car for Pullman to leave so she can move in on the little boy next door in the window. The lighting coming from behind her gave her curley red hair a kind of glow. Terrific shot. This is a story by Aaron Gorkin and written for the screen by Jonas McCord. They say it's a copy of another story, however, I don't know about that. I enjoyed this one, but my hat's off to the performers. They brought this one up to the high place of good ensemble acting.
38 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The God Complex and the Scammy Scamersons.
hitchcockthelegend13 February 2012
Malice is directed by Harold Becker and co-written by Aaron Sorkin and Scott Frank from a story by Jonas McCord. It stars Alec Baldwin, Nicole Kidman, Bill Pullman, Peter Gallagher, Bebe Neuwirth and Josef Sommer. Music is by Jerry Goldsmith and cinematography by Gordon Willis.

Andy (Pullman) and Tracy Safian (Kidman) take in a respectable Dr. Jed Hill (Baldwin) as a lodger thinking he ticks all the ace lodger boxes. However, he turns out to be far from ace and after having to perform emergency surgery on Tracy, the Safian's world gets turned upside down...

Malice is an old fashioned thriller, it has flaws and major implausibilities, but if taken on its own popcorn thriller terms it rounds out as a good night's entertainment. There's considerable thriller talent involved in the production, with Becker (Sea of Love), Frank (Dead Again), Sorkin (A Few Good Men), Kidman (Dead Calm) and Baldwin (The Hunt for Red October) all having been party to producing some quality genre offerings. It's loaded with betrayals and shifty shenanigans, and when the surprises come they are genuinely smart and worth the wait. But why the makers decided to tag in a pointless serial killer sub-plot is anyone's guess since it has no bearing on the otherwise well thought out story. Cast are on form, with Baldwin revelling in oily egomania and Pullman classical in gullible's travels mode.

You will wish it had a more thundering climax, even if it is actually a touch clever, and credibility is often stretched to breaking point, but Malice operates out of the upper echelons of 1990s thrillers and still remains entertaining today. 7/10
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A blatant rip-off!
cobravenom7110 July 2008
This is a pretty good movie, I'll admit that. I like Nicole Kidman, and Alec Baldwin is really just superb in a role like this.

The only problem I have with this movie is that it is a complete rip-off of a TV-movie made in 1990 called "The Operation", starring Lisa Hartman and Joe Penny in the Kidman and Baldwin roles respectively.

Typically, the move from low-budget TV-movie to Hollywood blockbuster has brought the expected revisions and 'beefing up' of the script. Everything added was extraneous and served no real purpose.

"The Operation" was actually a far better movie than this one, even if it was done on a movie-of-the-week budget. Watch it, and I think you'll agree.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Better Once Than Never.
Enosh Sunny11 September 2003
Malice is a movie for a subtle change in the mood. An attractive, delving, slow plot is enough to render you time for a bathroom break in between and a couple errands around your TV room but still keep you interested. The ending twist is what's bound to raise your eyebrow, maybe a twitch, but it will. Aaron Sorkin and Jonas McCord bring about their ability to utilize free time into this script, though it's not epic or anything, but they got you by a finger. Performances aren't anywhere close to laudable but their appearances, especially Nicole Kidman, are enchanting enough. Do remember to send your kids off around before Kidman & Pullman's bed scene. One aspect that nettled me was poor dialogues, weren't as good as they were needed in a thriller like this, and maybe a tad more enthusiasm from director Harold Becker would have gone a long way.

Check out the synopsis section for a better view on the film. Overall I'd give it 6 out of 10 for a good one time watch. You wouldn't be compelled to buy the DVD or anything, but maybe watch it again on one of the TV channels if sighted. There were some scenes that disable you to watch it with your kids, but who wants to watch a thriller starring Alec Baldwin with kids, right? So go on, it's okay, grab your husband/wife, get a bowl of chips or popcorn and click play at around 10pm. It'll make your night, maybe right after 10 minutes or so into the film.
18 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Jed,Andy,Tracy and the jack of clubs.
dbdumonteil26 January 2005
The first thing to bear in mind is that there are (like in Hitchcock's "family plot",there the comparison ends)TWO distinct plots :

-The threesome Baldwin/Pullman/Kidman and the ominous plans of some of them.

-And then a serial killer who hangs about the campus ,in the college where Andy works.

There's a very thin ,very thin connection between the two stories,and it's a question of ...well I will not write a spoiler.

The screenplay is far-fetched,but has enough unexpected twists to sustain the interest till the very end (yes,even the very last sequence contains a "revelation") But the real meat lies in one sequence.A bewildered Andy pays a visit to an old alcoholic shrew ,played by Mrs Bancroft.Had she had a more important part,she 'd have stolen the show hands down.Every minute of this sequence is a lesson young actresses should pay attention to.Dig the way she delivers the line :"welcome to the club".

"Malice" is fun to watch,after a hard day's labor.Not much food for thought,but entertaining throughout
17 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Slick, Supsensful, Mystery Thriller!
jbartelone25 January 2008
Malice is a very gripping mysterious thriller! The opening scene's haunting music will stay with you forever and draw you into a roller coaster ride of suspense, drama, and deceit.

The film revolves around a couple who's lives become interwoven by a mysterious and arrogant surgeon who manipulates and cons his way into their lives with little surprises around every turn. Harold Becker's directing is superb in setting the mood and pacing of the film. There are dramatic moments and secrets in the story that will keep you captivated until the very end. Watch for outstanding performances by Alec Baldwin, Nicole Kidman, and Bill Pullman, as well as a powerful supporting role by Ann Bancroft.

Malice is very difficult to review without giving away parts of the movie, so I will not go into great detail. It's the uncertainties in the movie that make it one to remember. See it, you will not be disappointed! The background musical score is one of the most memorable that I have heard in any movie. Malice is a tale of arrogance, power, mystery, and deception, that must be seen and will be long remembered after the final credits roll.

This is a very fine film that does not get the credit that it deserves!
49 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Gotta see it once
Ed Bone10 May 1999
Yeah, it's rated a seven, but the first time you see it, definitely a ten. Very interesting twist in the plot, and a terrific scene about Alec Baldwin's "God complex". See it to understand.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Cheating the customer
manuel-pestalozzi28 March 2006
To me Malice was a big disappointment. While I don't really find fault with the actors or the directing, the screenplay really stinks. I don't mind a storyline that runs in jumps, is unexpectedly shifting from one issue to another or characters who aren't what they seem to be, but it all should have a justification and some credibility. In this movie most of it just came across as a bad excuse because the writers didn't come up with a better idea. Malice has a big budget thrust and can't help being pretentious. That makes me angry, and as a viewer I feel cheated.

Some reviewers dare compare Malice with a Hitchcock picture. Every Hitchcock picture I have seen explores at least one of the main characters, their specific situation, trying to explain why these characters act and behave the way they do. Hitchcock pictures, for all their horror and shock value, are morally sound. I should like to call them honest. In Malice, some gruesome events and additional characters are just thrown in for good measure or out of embarrassment. The main characters come through as greedy, shallow and basically soulless creatures. In the context of this movie I find this somehow dishonest.

One of my three stars goes to Bill Pullman. Before, I knew him only from movies where he appeared in slick successful macho type roles. Here he plays a mild schoolteacher and shows that his range is much wider than I had previously thought. Two stars go to Anne Bancroft whose short performance up to a point atoned for the movie's lack in script integrity. I found it a pleasure just to watch her shuffle those cards.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
worth it just to see Anne Bancroft play a great role
pwpw6314 June 2009
I loved Anne Bancroft in this.

She's good in anything

but she was wonderfully wicked in this. A deliciously smart and nasty boozy mommy. I miss her as an actress and as a great human being. Nobody's quite like Anne Bancroft. She will be missed by people like me who love her. She's like the spider with the fly with she's talking with Kidman's hubby who just doesn't get the situation. Bancroft brings enormous power to this character. She's got to be one of the most extraordinary women actresses of our time. She's right up there with Streep and other greats.
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Unnerving. 7 of 10.
Nahret8 July 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Another movie that depicts the pure brilliance of Nicole Kidman. Her multifaceted portrayal steals the show. But on with the action.

Some spoilers.

This is probably the first time ever that a serial killer is used only to further the main plot, which turns out to be something else entirely. The story starts out easy enough: a happy couple, Tracy and Andy, live in a nice little town, where he's a college dean and she is a kindergarten teacher. She adores children and is being treated with oestrogen to increase the chances of getting pregnant. He loves her and dotes on her. So far, so good.

Then one day he meets an old school friend, who in the mean time has become a very successful surgeon. Since Jed is new in town, he is offered hospitality by his old friend. Of course, we guess immediately that there's something fishy about him. Inevitably, one day disaster strikes: Tracy is rushed to emergency room because of severe abdominal pain. Jed finds he has to remove her ovaries, thus also terminating a first trimester pregnancy.

Later it turns out that Jed made an error in judgment; one of Tracy's ovaries could have been saved. She receives an important amount money out of her malpractice suit, but what good does it do if she can never have children? She is bitter, her relationship to Andy takes irrepairable damage and she leaves him. Jed obviously has to move out. End of story?

Far from it. Since there is no such thing as a perfect crime, details that do not easily fall into place nag at Andy. Helped along by a rather surprising revelation courtesy of the local police, he follows the voice of his doubts and finds out more than he probably ever wanted to know.

The final twist is both cute (for its implausibility) and chilling, since it shows just how far people are willing to go in order to obtain, and keep, what they regard as happiness.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Distasteful, often ridiculous, but what a cast!
moonspinner5516 October 2007
Misbegotten, over-heated thriller about the new surgeon at a New England hospital who is invited to board with an old high school acquaintance and his wife, which soon leads to a series of crosses and double-crosses. Slickly-made assemblage of red herrings, plot-holes and clichés. An entire sub-plot about a serial rapist turns out to be fatuous padding, and some of the plot-twists are surprisingly tasteless for such a "classy", big-budget thriller. Terrific actors Alec Baldwin, Nicole Kidman and Bill Pullman (and Gwyneth Paltrow in a small part) manage to make the preliminaries gripping, but once the story threads start tying themselves into knots, there isn't much this cast can do except struggle. ** from ****
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An intriguing thriller.
Dale-3113 October 1998
This is an intriguing thriller with enough twists and turns to make you dizzy. It's hard to describe the plot and it's better that way. Bill Pullman and Nicole Kidman give great performances. Alec Baldwin is one of the most underrated actors in Hollywood and deserved great praise for his astonishing portrayal here.
34 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Just OK
jackson53h13 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I was so disappointed because I was hoping this movie was all gonna be about a murder mystery involving the two murdered college girls. Once they catch the janitor (killer) half way throughout the movie - its sort of disappointing - because I thought Jed would be the killer - but then they had to bring all that Nicole Kidman is the villain stuff, and it sorta ruined it. It was almost like there was two different plots to the movie and the first didn't really seem to be a big deal. I did like the end though - acting was good too (great cast). If you want to watch a good thriller, you probably won't be happy with this, but there was plenty of suspense.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A smart psychological thriller with interesting plot twists.
shanfloyd30 June 2006
"Malice" features three of the finest actors in business - Alec Baldwin, Bill Pullman and Nicole Kidman in a brilliantly crafted complex mystery with smart direction and great screen writing. The plot twists are quite clever and they alter the pace and flavor of the story in a fruitful manner. There are indeed some unnecessary subplots present just in order to bring out those twists, but where isn't? I partly agree with a previous commenter who thinks Hitchcock would attempt for such a story if he had lived to this day.

Among the actors, Alec Baldwin shines bright as the rather eccentric and egotistic doctor. He was quite helped by the screenplay to show off his talents. Bill Pullman also had some of his best moments in this film, especially in the last confrontation with Kidman's character Tracy in the restaurant. Kidman, on the other hand, is a little dull for her role, which is extremely challenging according to the film's plot. There's also Bebe Newirth with a fake accent and an early Gwyneth Paltrow in minor roles.

The script is exceptionally good. There are plenty of memorable quotes and quite less cheeky dialogues. The monologue of Alec Baldwin towards Peter Gallagher about his 'god complex' is priceless, however unrealistic it may seem. Same can be said about the last Pullman-Kidman meeting. It's actually quite refreshing to see a thriller with such smart dialogues. Aaron Sorkin's next works are therefore highly anticipated.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Suspend your disbelief...
culwin4 August 2002
Some things in this movie are a bit unbelievable, which is the reason I only gave it a 7. However, it is entertaining and worth the rental. Alec Baldwin is perfect as the narcissistic, pretentious jerk. Look for Gwenyth Paltrow in one of her first film appearances.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Average
sal_ruggiero2 August 2000
Bill Pullman, who should be billed first, gives a great performance with average roles played by Alec Baldwin and Nicole Kidman. The story line was very well thought out and well.

It's worth seeing because of the story.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
some nice twists and intensity in this one
disdressed1224 August 2007
this is one very good movie.it's got suspense,a twisting plot,great intensity,and a good story.it may not be wholly original,but it think it works,thanks to its three main actors,Alec Baldwin(The Good Shepherd)Nicole Kidman(The Interpreter)and Bill Pullman.But Kidman really surprised me with the intensity she brought to her role.i'm generally not a fan,but she is effective in this movie.the supporting performances are also good.i also like the fact that the movie isn't completely predictable,like happens in so many movies.the movie is also very well paced.there are no lagging spots to slow things down to the point of boredom.anyway,i really enjoyed it. 8/10
27 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
So implausible as to be stupid...
Charles-3126 December 2001
This movie is suspenseful enough, but the plot is so drastically implausible as to be absolutely idiotic at points. Even when we figure out what is going on, a very forced ending is used to make you suspect character motives even though this ending could never happen in real life. This movie suffers from so many flaws it's not practical to list them here. The real highlight is a massive red herring added just to supply one tiny plot point. And, the personal relationships in this movie don't make any sense at all. Even if you buy the "grand con" approach to everything, it still does not work. Don't waste the excessively long period of time this movie will steal from your life.

One good point to this movie: for those of you tired of hearing about the vastly overrated Nicole Kidman, you get a bit of revenge here (and lots of shots of her naked bottom as well, guess she realizes her only good points all too well).
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
plot element overload with little satisfaction
SnoopyStyle9 May 2015
Andy Safian (Bill Pullman) is the Associate Dean at a local college. A serial rapist attacks a student and the new hot-shot brash doctor Jed Hill (Alec Baldwin) saves her life. Andy realizes that Jed is a popular former high school classmate. Andy's wife Tracy (Nicole Kidman) is a children school teacher and his former student. Andy rents out their third floor to Jed but he's a bad tenant. Andy finds the dead body of student Paula Bell (Gwyneth Paltrow) and detective Dana Harris (Bebe Neuwirth) sees him as a suspect despite being his friend. Tracy suffers a rupture of an ovarian cyst. A drunk Jed operates and mistakenly takes out both ovaries as well as causing a miscarriage. Tracy blames Andy for allowing it to happen as she sues Jed.

The movie is overloaded with red herring, blind twist and subplots where a serial killer actually dead ends to nothing but a random guy. At some point, I wonder what this movie is really about. It has so much plot that it sinks under its own weight. It may hurt Aaron Sorkin physically but he needed to simplify the story. Alec Baldwin is chewing up the dialog and is a full-on arrogant douche. In a simple story about Jed, that would be a powerful scene. However it becomes just another big writing scene in a movie full of wild writing.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Full-bodied and satisfying nastiness
Terrell-425 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Take a surgeon with a God complex, a perfect young wife who loves kids, add a sincere doofus of a husband and you will have Malice, an intricate insurance-murder mystery that leaves a satisfyingly full-bodied, nasty taste in your mouth.

Andy Safian (Bill Pullman) is a decent, sincere dean at a picture-perfect small college in a picture-perfect New England town. His wife, Tracy (Nicole Kidman), volunteers at a children's center five days a week. They've just bought an old, rundown Victorian house they plan to remodel and fill with kids of their own. In to town comes Dr. Jed Hill (Alec Baldwin), the hospital's new surgeon and a hot shot cutter. Andy and Jed meet the same day and Jed winds up renting Andy's and Tracy's third floor room. Jed needs a place to stay temporarily and Andy and Tracy can use the extra income for remodeling expenses.

And then Tracy starts to have abdominal pains. One night she's rushed to the hospital, where Jed operates after getting Andy's permission. Jed removes an ovary he says was cancerous. It turns out Tracy had been pregnant and the ovary was healthy. A medical hearing is held. The result is that Tracy is awarded $20 million, but she is so angry with Andy that she leaves him. Ah, but there's more. To say what would ruin a good mystery. Let's just say that there are a lot of twists and that things very often aren't what they seem. There is some really unpleasant manipulation going on, plus a degree of sexual ruthlessness that would make a fine entry into Krafft-Ebing's Psychopathia Sexualis.

The most serious drawback to the movie is a major red herring involving a serial criminal that goes nowhere. The purpose seems only to give Andy a reason to spend the last half of the movie with a seriously bruised face. There also is a semi-red herring involving a doctor in another town that, for the life of me, I couldn't figure out. I think it was most likely a plot point that became a loose string the director figured the audience would forget about.

The movie features fine performances by all. Pullman's decent guy persona drives the second half of the movie. Two one-off cameos by George C. Scott as a respected surgeon and Anne Bancroft as...well, you'll need to see the movie...are both important to the plot. Bebe Neuwirth as police detective Dana Harris, a friend of Andy's, nearly steals every scene she's in. She uses an accent that reminds me of Maerose Prizzi, but even so she radiates no- nonsense common sense and a real concern for Andy. Nicole Kidman is what the movie is all about. She gives a performance that is subtle and forceful. Amazingly, 16 years after she made this movie her forehead still has no trace of a wrinkle. Alec Baldwin has spent the latter half of his movie career specializing in unlikable egoists. Here he's interesting and at least a little likable. And does his character, Dr. Jed Hill, really have a God complex? Here's what Dr. Hill has to say for himself: "I have an M.D. from Harvard. I am board certified in cardio- thoratic medicine and trauma surgery. I have been awarded citations from seven different medical boards in New England, and I am never, ever sick at sea. So I ask you: When someone goes into that chapel and they fall on their knees and they pray to God that their wife doesn't miscarry or that their daughter doesn't bleed to death or that their mother doesn't suffer acute neural trauma from post-operative shock, who do you think they're praying to? Now, go ahead and read your Bible, and you go to your church...and, with any luck, you might win the annual raffle. But if you're looking for God, he was in operating room number two on November 17, and he doesn't like to be second guessed. You ask me if I have a God complex. Let me tell you something: I am God."

On balance, Malice is a nifty piece of complex nastiness.
23 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Generic thriller, watchable but not that great
Samiam331 October 2010
At a certain point in Malace, I kind of lost faith in the movie. It starts off as one thing and then becomes another by cheating with the plot in a obvious attempt to pull the wool over our eyes. At the beginning, and for a short but involving while, Malice looks like a psycho killer film. then it turns into a rather generic film noir, with all the stereotypes: the high heels, the black mail, the bad girl, and a spectacular fall from a high place in slow motion. The plot gets progressively hard to believe and Nicole Kidman is given more than her acting ability can handle, which becomes a burden on the movie

During the earlier portion of the movie (the better portion) Malice demonstrates on two or even three occasions that Director Harold Becker is more than capable of making his product not just a thriller but a scary movie, the kind that makes the audience jump, but suspense seems to be of little interest in the end.

Malice entertains only on a superficial level. At times it can draw you towards the edge of your seat, but more often it has you sitting back, tired from watching genre clichés play out. What starts off good slowly degrades into a b-movie, a one in a million enterprise which may prove useful only if it is the only movie on the box late at night. It is certainly not unwatchable, it just not all that good.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Stupid, and has not aged well
LilyDaleLady28 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Caught this on late night TV -- can it be almost 25 years ago? wow. Most of the folks here have gone to amazing careers, and need no introduction -- Baldwin, Kidman, Pullman, scriptwriter Sorkin.

But this is a terribly written movie -- handsomely produced -- finest actors -- but ultimately feels like a manipulative rip-off. I am not sure I processed that back in '93, because I knew less about both fertility treatments and the legal system.

For starters: "Jeb Hill" (Baldwin) is an absolutely top surgeon at an MA hospital, but is willing to operate on his GIRLFRIEND, rendering her both sterile and MENOPAUSAL (!!!) by removing both of her ovaries -- for a lousy $20 million? Hello? the actor was 34 here, so presumably his character is roughly this age -- a surgeon at the BEGINNING of a brilliant, 35 plus year career -- and who would throw it AWAY for a lousy $20 million?

Wait a sec. But it isn't $20 million. $20 mil is the SETTLEMENT, meaning Kidman's lawyers skim a minimum of 30% off the top, and more likely 40%. Let's go with 30% though. Now it is only $14 million. And the two con artists would presumably be splitting it -- they are not even married -- so that's a lousy $7 million each. (In reality, this would have gone to trial -- Dr. Hill's remarks were off the record, and he would have retracted them -- and that would have probably meant way less even than this.)

$7 million? to give up your CAREER, which presumably Hill loves and is brilliant at-- to retire in his early 30s? A thoracic surgeon probably earned close to half a million a YEAR back then -- over just 20 years that is $10 million by itself.

And Kidman was willing to go through SURGICAL MENOPAUSE to get her $7 million? with all of the risks, discomforts, etc. of early menopause? The script keeps saying "children" but she never wanted kids (*because we all know that mean bee-yotches in movies are not maternal and hate kids). But did she want the OTHER risks and miseries of menopause? or the side effects of taking estrogen pills for the next 20 years? HOT FLASHES? hair loss, weight gain, dry skin, sexual side effects?

Are you kidding me? If a woman HAD $7 million, she'd probably gladly pay every penny to be able to NOT go through early menopause!

It is as if the scriptwriters had no idea what really happens to women to lose their ovaries. They did not do even the most minimal research.

Today, this would be even greater hooey, since it would be easy to have tested the aborted fetus to determine if it was Bill Pullman's biological child, which would have blown the whole lawsuit apart. The plot line with him accused of rape feels manipulative.

Also the end with the whole "blind child they think has seen everything" -- unbelievably hokey and "convenient". The whole script is just stupid & manipulative.

Only bright spot is a small role by the legendary Anne Bancroft -- giving everyone here a master's class in art of real acting (as Kidman's drunk, hostile mother). Though whoever thought that dark, ethnic looking Bancroft could be the mom of pale, lanky redhead Kidman doesn't know much about genetics as well. And what abusive DRUNK cares if they drink single malt scotch? Do the writers here know that a single malt costs about 10 times what a bottle of cheap whiskey costs? No drunk would make that cost/benefit analysis and decide to drink the hoity-toity stuff.

A film that was never very good and has aged badly. Only interesting to see Kidman (a tremendous natural beauty here at 25) and Alec Baldwin (a super-hottie in his day) when young. Baldwin especially has matured into an hilarious comedian, once he aged past his hottie stage.

Only worth viewing again for Bancroft's terrific scene, which is only about 4 minutes out of the whole film.
7 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed